Blog Summary
Traditional approaches to AI adoption in large companies, such as multi-year strategy documents and lengthy vendor selection processes, are failing because they are too slow and rigid for the rapidly evolving nature of AI. These methods, which focus on theoretical perfection and extensive planning, often get stuck in "pilot purgatory" and fail to deliver tangible results. A more effective approach is to prioritize execution over strategy. This involves starting with a specific, high-impact business problem, moving quickly to implement a solution, and demonstrating value in a short timeframe (e.g., 90 days). This method builds credibility, proves the technology's worth, and creates a foundation for sustainable AI adoption.
Key Questions Answered by the Article
Why are traditional AI strategies and vendor selections ineffective for large companies?
Traditional strategies are ineffective because they are too slow and rigid. The time it takes to create a comprehensive, multi-year plan and select a vendor means that the underlying AI technology has already changed, and the theoretical plans often fail to account for real-world implementation challenges like messy data and organizational resistance.
What is the recommended alternative to a comprehensive AI strategy?
The recommended alternative is to start with a specific, high-impact business problem that can be solved quickly. This execution-first approach focuses on demonstrating tangible value in a short timeframe (e.g., 90 days) by automating a single, contained workflow, such as expense processing or contract review.
What three elements are crucial for successful AI implementation in a large enterprise?
Successful AI implementation requires three key elements: speed over perfection, focusing on achieving a 70% automated solution quickly; partnership over procurement, finding a partner who understands change management; and demonstration over documentation, proving the value of the AI with concrete results rather than through presentations or reports.
Moving Beyond the Expense of Strategy Paralysis: How Enterprise Leaders Win with AI Action
The uncomfortable truth is that traditional enterprise approaches to AI are fundamentally broken. The age-old playbook of comprehensive strategy development followed by vendor selection doesn't work in an era where AI capabilities evolve monthly, not annually.
The McKinsey Mirage
Large enterprises instinctively seek what has worked before: hiring prestigious consultants to craft comprehensive strategies. These engagements produce impressive deliverables—market analyses, competitive landscapes, and technology roadmaps spanning three to five years. But AI isn't like previous technology waves. When a traditional strategy is finalized, the underlying assumptions about what's possible shift dramatically.
More critically, these strategies often remain theoretical because they don't account for the messy realities of enterprise implementation. They assume clean data, willing stakeholders, and seamless integration—luxuries that exist only in PowerPoint presentations.
The Vendor Selection Trap
The second broken approach is the traditional RFP process. Enterprises spend months defining requirements, evaluating vendors, and negotiating contracts, only to discover that their carefully specified solution addresses yesterday's problems with tomorrow's timeline.
This approach treats AI like enterprise software circa 2010—something you buy, deploy, and use for years. But AI requires experimentation, iteration, and continuous learning. The vendor that looks perfect on paper often struggles with your specific data, workflows, and organizational dynamics.
A Different Path Forward
Innovative enterprise leaders are taking a radically different approach. Instead of using comprehensive strategies or vendor selections, they're starting with specific, high-impact use cases that can demonstrate value quickly while building organizational capability.
The key is choosing battles you can win—workflows that are painful enough to matter but contained sufficiently to control. Think expense processing, contract review, customer inquiry routing, or compliance documentation. These aren't the flashy use cases that make headlines, but they're the foundation for sustainable AI adoption.
Success requires three elements that traditional approaches miss:
Speed over perfection. Instead of waiting for the perfect strategy, identify one workflow that could be 70% automated within 90 days. The learning from this first implementation will be worth more than months of theoretical planning.
Partnership over procurement. You need a technology partner who understands that enterprise AI is as much about change management as it is about algorithms—someone who can help you navigate organizational resistance, data quality issues, and integration challenges in real-time.
Demonstration over documentation. Your path to credibility isn't through another presentation—it's through showing tangible results. When you demonstrate that AI reduced processing time by 60% or improved accuracy by 40%, you earn the right to bigger conversations and budgets.
Building Your Track Record
The executive who succeeds with AI in large enterprises isn't the one with the most comprehensive strategy—it's the one with the most compelling results. Start small, move fast, and prove value before expanding scope.
Your career trajectory depends not on perfect planning but on ideal execution of imperfect plans. In a world where AI capabilities are evolving rapidly, the ability to learn and adapt quickly becomes your competitive advantage.
The question isn't whether your company will eventually embrace AI—it's whether you'll be the leader who makes it happen or the one who spends years planning while others act.
The era of AI strategy is over. The era of AI execution has begun.
.png)
.png)
.png)
